Buy This Entire Record For
Kampschroer v. Anoka County
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
August 30, 2019
Jessica Leah Kampschroer; Cory Patrick Kampschroer, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
Anoka County; City of Anoka; City of Apple Valley; City of Arlington; City of Baxter; City of Belle Plaine; Beltrami County; Benton County; City of Blaine; City of Bloomington; Blue Earth County; City of Braham; City of Brooklyn Center; City of Brooklyn Park; City of Brownton; City of Burnsville; City of Cambridge; City of Cannon Falls; Carver County; Cass County; Centennial Lakes Police Department; City of Champlin; City of Chaska; City of Chisago; Chisago County; City of Columbia Heights; City of Corcoran; City of Cottage Grove; City of Crosby; Crow Wing County; City of Crystal, Defendants - Appellees, Dakota County, Defendant, City of Deephaven; City of Dundas; City of Eagan; City of Eden Prairie; City of Edina; City of Elk River; City of Fairmont; Faribault County; City of Faribault; City of Farmington; City of Foley, Defendants - Appellees, Fillmore County, Defendant, City of Forest Lake; City of Fridley; City of Glencoe; City of Golden Valley; Goodhue County; City of Goodview; Grant County; City of Hastings; Hennepin County; City of Hopkins; City of Howard Lake; Hubbard County; City of Hutchinson; City of Inver Grove Heights; City of Isanti; Isanti County; City of Jordan; Kanabec County; Lakes Area Police Department; City of Lakeville; Le Sueur County; City of Litchfield; City of Mankato; City of Maple Grove; City of Maplewood; McLeod County; City of Medina; Mille Lacs County; City of Minneapolis; City of Minnetonka; City of Montgomery; City of Moorhead; Morrison County; City of Morristown; City of Mounds View; Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Defendants - Appellees, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Defendant, City of New Brighton; City of New Hope; City of New Prague; City of Newport; Nicollet County; City of North Saint Paul; City of North Mankato; City of Northfield; Olmsted County; City of Owatonna; City of Prior Lake, Defendants - Appellees, Ramsey County, Defendant, City of Ramsey; Rice County; City of Richfield; City of Robbinsdale; City of Rochester, Defendants - Appellees, Rochester Motors, LLC, Defendant, City of Rosemount; City of Roseville; City of Sartell; City of Savage; Scott County; City of Shakopee; Sherburne County; City of Spring Lake Park; City of Saint Cloud, Defendants - Appellees, Saint Louis County, Defendant, City of Saint Louis Park; City of Saint Paul; City of Staples; Stearns County; Steele County; City of Stillwater; City of West Saint Paul; Wadena County; City of Waite Park; Washington County; City of Wayzata; City of White Bear Lake; Winona County; City of Woodbury; Wright County; Yellow Medicine County, Defendants - Appellees, Michael Campion, in his individual capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety; Ramona Dohman, in her individual capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety; John and Jane Does (1-1500), acting in their individual capacity as supervisors, officers, deputies, staff, investigators, employees or agents of the other governmental agencies; Entity Does (1-50), including cities, counties, municipalities, and other entities sited in Minnesota and federal departments and agencies; DPS Does; Metropolitan Council, Defendants, Pine County; City of Coon Rapids; Dakota Communications Center; City of Mendota Heights; City of Saint Anthony; City of Saint Francis; City of Saint Paul Park; City of Saint Peter, Defendants - Appellees, Pat McCormack, in her individual capacity as the Director of Driver and Vehicle Services at the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Defendant.
Submitted: February 12, 2019
from United States District Court for the District of
Minnesota - Minneapolis
LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
COLLOTON, CIRCUIT JUDGE.
and Cory Kampschroer brought this action against a group of
cities, counties, local entities, and individuals, alleging
violations of the Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA),
18 U.S.C. §§ 2721-2725. After dismissing claims
against some of the defendants, the district
court permitted limited discovery to determine
whether the Kampschroers were entitled to equitable tolling
on claims that had accrued outside the statutory limitations
period. The court then concluded that equitable tolling was
unavailable and granted summary judgment for the remaining
defendants on the time-barred claims. The Kampschroers
appeal, and we affirm.
Kampschroer has worked as a news reporter for a local
Minnesota television station since 2003. Her husband Cory
worked as a news anchor and reporter for a different local
station from 2006 to 2010.
2008, Jessica learned about unauthorized viewing of her
driving record by a state employee. Patricia McCormack,
Director of the Driver and Vehicle Services Division (DVS) of
the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, notified Jessica
by letter dated May 29. McCormack wrote that an internal
audit revealed that an employee had accessed Jessica's
private information for purposes that were not work-related.
McCormack apologized for the "misuse of the Driver and
Vehicle Service database," and stated that "[t]he
department has taken the appropriate and allowable
disciplinary actions necessary to address this matter with
the employee." The letter's heading listed
"Driver and Vehicle Services" under a banner with
the words "Minnesota Department of Public Safety."
McCormack signed the letter as Director of "Driver and
Vehicle Services." Jessica understood the letter to mean
that DVS had audited use of the database by all employees of
the Department of Public Safety, which she thought included
all city and county employees involved in public safety.
called McCormack soon after receiving the letter. For privacy
reasons, McCormack could not give Jessica many details about
the employee who had accessed her information improperly.
McCormack did say that the employee was undergoing a
disciplinary process and that the employee had acted out of
"basic curiosity." Jessica and McCormack both
testified that McCormack may have told Jessica that the
improper access at issue was an "isolated
incident." Jessica continued to believe that her
information had been accessed improperly only once. Cory saw
the letter, discussed it with Jessica, and may have been
present during Jessica's phone call with McCormack.
11, 2008, Jessica's bank notified her that changes had
been made to the personal profile section of her account.
Concerned by the proximity of the bank notice to the DVS
letter, Jessica spoke with McCormack again on the phone.
McCormack reiterated that she could not disclose personal
information about the employee, but assured Jessica that
there was no reason to be concerned. The changes to
Jessica's bank account turned out to be unrelated to the
improper use of the DVS database.
15, 2008, Jessica searched for and printed out a news script
from earlier in the year that reported on unauthorized
viewing of driver's license information. The script said
that two customer service specialists for the Department of
Public Safety were accused of accessing the personal
information of about 400 people. On June 19, an anonymous
source sent a letter to an attorney at Jessica's
television station suggesting that the station should
investigate unlawful access to driver's license data by
the Department of Public Safety. The attorney provided the
letter to Jessica.
four years later, in January 2013, the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources sent a letter notifying Jessica that one
of its employees had accessed Jessica's motor vehicle
records without authorization. Jessica and Cory then each
requested a full audit of their motor vehicle records. The
audits suggested that the Kampschroers' private
information had been accessed more than 1, 400 times between
2003 and 2013.
Kampschroers sued numerous cities, counties, local entities,
and individuals on September 15, 2013. In their second
amended complaint, the Kampschroers alleged, inter
alia, that the defendants violated the DPPA by knowingly
obtaining, disclosing, or using the Kampschroers'
personal information for impermissible purposes. See
18 U.S.C. §§ 2721, 2724(a). The district court
dismissed claims brought against certain defendants for
failure to state a claim. Applying the four-year statute of
limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a), the court reasoned
that other claims arising from violations that occurred
before September 15, 2009, would normally be time-barred,
because the statute begins to run when a violation occurs.
See McDonough v. Anoka County, 799 F.3d 931, 943
(8th Cir. 2015). But the court concluded that limited
discovery was warranted to address whether the Kampschroers
were entitled to equitable tolling on account of
McCormack's representations in May 2008.
discovery, the district court granted the remaining
defendants' motions for summary judgment on claims for
violations that occurred before September 15, 2009. The court
determined that Jessica's confusion over the scope of the
May 2008 DVS audit was insufficient to warrant equitable
tolling. The court also reasoned that Jessica was in a better
position to discover DPPA violations than most plaintiffs
because she had encountered evidence of unauthorized DVS
database access at multiple times in 2008. Because Cory
relied on the same confusion over the DVS audit, the court
concluded that he was not entitled to equitable tolling