January 18, 1932
ARNESON ET AL
UNITED IRRIGATION CO. ET AL.
Appeal from the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth Supreme Judicial District of Texas.
Hughes, Holmes, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Stone, Roberts
Per Curiam : The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on non-federal grounds adequate to support it (Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268; Browne v. Union Pacific R. Co., 267 U.S. 255; Live Oak Water Users' Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U.S. 354, 359; Security National Bank v. Twinde, 278 U.S. 659; Garysburg Mfg. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 280 U.S. 520); and for the want of a substantial federal question (Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U.S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U.S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U.S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U.S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191).
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.